Hicks et al v. Direct Hit Logistics, Inc. et al
Ellen Hicks and Jamie Sherman |
Direct Hit Logistics, Inc. and DHL Express (USA) Inc. doing business as DHL Express |
3:2021cv00589 |
November 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Direct Hit Logistics, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons)(tlj) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Ellen Hicks, Jamie Sherman. DHL Express (USA) Inc. waiver sent on 11/9/2021, answer due 1/10/2022. (Osterwise, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to DHL EXPRESS (USA) INC. d.b.a. DHL EXPRESS on 11/09/2021 by Ellen Hicks, Jamie Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service for DHL)(Osterwise, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DHL Express (USA) Inc., Direct Hit Logistics, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5296321), filed by Ellen Hicks, Jamie Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Plaintiffs' Consent Forms)(Osterwise, Jeffrey) Modified docket text on 11/1/2021 (kab). |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(kab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.