Mixon v. State of North Carolina et al
| Aqeel Mixon |
| State of North Carolina, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, F. Wilson, FNU Mullen, Garry L. McFadden, Johnny Jennings, Chris Blue, P. Chung, S.C. Sterrett, Mary Patterson, Queen City Rehab & Renovations, LLC and Does |
| 3:2021cv00631 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Pro Se AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Aqeel Mixon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(tlj) |
| Filing 3 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aqeel Mixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tlj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $402.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 12/14/2021. (tlj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. And #Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The document was served conventionally by US Mail (tlj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT (Notice of Removal) against All Defendants, filed by Aqeel Mixon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
