XPO Logistics, Inc. v. Schroeder
XPO Logistics, Inc. |
John Schroeder |
3:2021cv00634 |
November 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Graham Mullen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Wiles on behalf of XPO Logistics, Inc. (Wiles, Spencer) |
Filing 7 Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan: Estimated Trial Time: four (4) days. Discovery due by 6/15/2022. Motions due by 7/15/2022. Mediation deadline set for 2/22/2022. Jury Trial set for 11/14/2022 10:00 AM in Courtroom #8, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Graham Mullen.. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/10/2021. (ef) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by XPO Logistics, Inc. (Jarrell, Douglas) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Jarrell, Douglas) |
Filing 4 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/7/2021. (brl) |
Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Protective Order by XPO Logistics, Inc.. Responses due by 12/21/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Consent Protective Order) (Jarrell, Douglas) |
NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 12/28/2021. (ef) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by John Schroeder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Davis, Edward) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ef) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 21-CVS-17162. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5332539), filed by John Schroeder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant, #4 Exhibit Notice to State Court of Removal)(Davis, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: XPO Logistics, Inc. v. Schroeder | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: XPO Logistics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | David Calep Wright, III |
Represented By: | Douglas M. Jarrell |
Represented By: | Spencer Wiles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Schroeder | |
Represented By: | Edward B. Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.