Hush v. Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff: Latoya Hush
Defendant: Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00655
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Max O Cogburn
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Strike #12 Response in Opposition to Motion MOTION for Entry of Default MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. Replies due by 2/8/2022 (Dalton, Kevin)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Pro Se REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION to Strike #9 Answer to Complaint MOTION for Entry of Default MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Latoya Hush. (tlj)
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Strike #9 Answer to Complaint MOTION for Entry of Default MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. Replies due by 1/31/2022 (Dalton, Kevin)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Pro Se MOTION to Strike #12 Response in Opposition to Motion ( Responses due by 2/1/2022 ), Pro Se MOTION for Entry of Default, Pro Se MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Latoya Hush. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (tlj)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Pro Se MOTION to Strike #9 Answer to Complaint ( Responses due by 1/25/2022 ), Pro Se MOTION for Entry of Default, Pro Se MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Latoya Hush. (tlj)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Exhibit by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. Exhibit to #12 Response in Opposition to Motion Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Dottie Woodruff (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 2 - Alexandre C. Halow)(Dalton, Kevin)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. Replies due by 1/18/2022 (Dalton, Kevin)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Virginia M. Wooten on behalf of Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc. (Wooten, Virginia)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PSAP Opt In/Out Form mailed to Pro Se Litigant. PSAP Response due by 1/19/2022. (ams)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc..(Dalton, Kevin)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Responses due by 1/10/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/29/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
December 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. Responses due by 1/12/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time) (Dalton, Kevin). Motions referred to David Keesler.
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Pro Se Exhibit by Latoya Hush. Exhibit to #5 Motion to Remand to State Court (js)
December 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Pro Se MOTION to Remand to State Court by Latoya Hush. Responses due by 1/3/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (tlj). Motions referred to David Keesler.
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint contained in document no. #1 Notice of Removal. Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc. answer due 1/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/10/21. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dalton, Kevin). Motions referred to David Keesler.
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc. (Dalton, Kevin)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 21-CVS-16171. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5350041), filed by Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Notice of Removal)(Dalton, Kevin)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hush v. Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Hush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schwan's Consumer Brands, Inc.
Represented By: Kevin Joseph Dalton
Represented By: Virginia M. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?