Madsen v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Alva Madsen, III |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC and Bank of America Corporation |
| 3:2021cv00658 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Bank of America Corporation.(Urps, Tonya) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC.(Dailey, Colin) |
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC (Dailey, Colin) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Dailey, Colin). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin D. Dailey on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC (Dailey, Colin) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Equifax Information Services, LLC answer due 2/4/2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 1/6/2022. (DLG)
|
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America Corporation (Urps, Tonya) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint by Bank of America Corporation. Responses due by 1/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Urps, Tonya). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Tonya L. Urps on behalf of Bank of America Corporation (Urps, Tonya) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Bank of America Corporation answer due 2/3/2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/28/2021. (DLG)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alva Madsen, III. Bank of America Corporation served on 12/14/2021, answer due 1/4/2022. (Rozenberg, Mark) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Mark Rozenburg for Alva Madsen, III (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/10/2021. (brl)
|
| Notice to Mark Rozenberg: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 12/17/2021. (brl) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bank of America Corporation. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (js) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Mark Rozenberg Filing fee $ 288, receipt number BNCWDC-5352652. by Alva Madsen, III. (Emory, C.). Motions referred to David S. Cayer. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America Corporation, Equifax Information Services, LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5352324), filed by Alva Madsen III.(Emory, C.) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
