Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
| Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00675 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Robert M. Fuhrer for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/2/2022. (kab)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Bryan P. Collins for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/2/2022. (kab)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Robert M. Fuhrer Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-5420944. by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Enns, Rodrick). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Bryan P. Collins Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-5420905. by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Enns, Rodrick). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Notice to Bryan P. Collins: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 2/9/2022. (kab) |
| Notice to Robert M. Fuhrer: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 2/9/2022. (kab) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Nichole Griffin on behalf of Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd. (Griffin, Lauren) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. answer due 2/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/14/22. (mga)
|
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Enns, Rodrick). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Rodrick J. Enns on behalf of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Enns, Rodrick) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd.. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. served on 12/28/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Connor, Michael) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (brl) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd. (Connor, Michael) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the Filing of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (tlj) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5364801), filed by Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Connor, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
