Beyan v. Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department
Plaintiff: James L Beyan, Jr and James L. Beyan, Jr
Defendant: Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department
Case Number: 3:2022cv00012
Filed: January 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 3/7/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ams)
February 1, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 2/14/2022. (brl)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff shall, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Order. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department as a Defendant. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 1/31/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
January 31, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER denying #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department (See Doc. 4). Entered by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 1/31/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
January 29, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department. Responses due by 2/14/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum) (McCalman, Roger). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
January 10, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by James L Beyan, Jr. (js)
January 10, 2022 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department with Jury Demand, filed by James L Beyan, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Summons)(js)
January 10, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beyan v. Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James L Beyan, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James L. Beyan, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlotte Mecklenburg County Police Department
Represented By: Roger A. McCalman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?