Carles v. Wells Fargo
Davi Carles |
Wells Fargo |
3:2022cv00161 |
April 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Magistrate Judge David Keesler no longer assigned to case. (tlj) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Wells Fargo on 4/14/2022 by Davi Carles. Waiver of Service due by 5/16/2022. (tlj) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CHD070779), filed by Davi Carles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carles v. Wells Fargo | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Davi Carles | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo | |
Represented By: | Kevin Joseph Dalton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.