Carles v. Wells Fargo
Plaintiff: Davi Carles
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Case Number: 3:2022cv00161
Filed: April 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Kenneth D Bell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2022 Magistrate Judge David Keesler no longer assigned to case. (tlj)
April 14, 2022 Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Wells Fargo on 4/14/2022 by Davi Carles. Waiver of Service due by 5/16/2022. (tlj)
April 14, 2022 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Wells Fargo with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number CHD070779), filed by Davi Carles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(tlj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carles v. Wells Fargo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Davi Carles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Represented By: Kevin Joseph Dalton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?