Sibounheuang v. USA
| Kongmany Sibounheung |
| USA |
| 3:2022cv00276 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO ANSWER 2255 MOTION. Responses due by 10/14/2022. Any reply filed by Petitioner must be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the United States' response. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/15/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED Pro Se MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No. 3:20-cr-306-RJC-DSC, filed by Kongmany Sibounheung.(brl)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER denying as moot Petitioner's #4 Motion for Leave to Amend. Petitioner's #5 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED. The #2 Order on Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) and #3 Clerk's Judgment are VACATED. The Clerk is instructed to docket the Amended Motion to Vacate [Doc. 4-1] as a separate docket entry, and to reopen this case. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/12/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
|
Case Reopened per Order (Doc. No. 6) entered on 8/12/2022 (brl)
|
|
Filing 5
Pro Se MOTION for Reconsideration re #2 Order on Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), #3 Clerk's Judgment by Kongmany Sibounheung. Responses due by 8/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope) (tlj)
|
|
Filing 4
Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Amend by Kongmany Sibounheung. Responses due by 8/5/2022 (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope) (tlj)
|
|
Filing 3
**VACATED PER ORDER ENTERED ON 8/12/2022 (Doc. No. 6)** CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 7/8/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) Modified on 8/12/2022 (brl).
|
|
Filing 2
**VACATED PER ORDER ENTERED ON 8/12/2022 (Doc. No. 6)** ORDER denying Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). This Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/8/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl) Modified on 8/12/2022 (brl).
|
|
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj)
|
|
Filing 1
Pro Se MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) re: Criminal Case No. 3:20-cr-00306-1 ( USA2255Group added.), filed by Kongmany Sibounheung. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sibounheuang v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kongmany Sibounheung | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
