United States of America v. Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency
Case Number: 3:2022cv00290
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Max O Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency. (Shepard, Shaefer). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's answer due 9/1/2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 8/9/2022. (DLG)
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLAIM Verified Claim and Statement of Interest by Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency. (Shepard, Shaefer)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 07/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, J.)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Service (Direct Notice) by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Johnson, J.)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency. (Shepard, Shaefer). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Shaefer Allen Shepard on behalf of Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency (Shepard, Shaefer)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's answer due 8/17/2022. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/13/2022. (DLG)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest of Property. Signed by Clerk Frank G. Johns. (ef)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America.(Johnson, J.)
June 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: J. Seth Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $22,908.66 in United States Currency
Represented By: Shaefer Allen Shepard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?