Potts v. Cloud Productions, Inc. et al
| Erin E. Potts |
| Cloud Productions, Inc., William Henry Cloud and Jennifer Laine |
| 3:2022cv00346 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David S Cayer |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan . ALL Parties Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction (Denton, Lee) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by William Henry Cloud, Cloud Productions, Inc..(Denton, Lee) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by William Henry Cloud, Cloud Productions, Inc. (Denton, Lee) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County General Court of Justice Superior Court Division, case number 22-CVS-9733. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5678260), filed by William Henry Cloud, Cloud Productions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- General Civil Action Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B- Civil Summonses, #3 Exhibit C- Verified Complaint)(Denton, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
