Sapp v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, City of Charlotte, MJ Putnam, Johnny Jennings, G. Fischer and R. Davis
Case Number: 3:2022cv00412
Filed: August 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Kenneth D Bell
Referring Judge: David S Cayer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff shall PAY the filing fee in these actions within 14 days of this Order. Any Complaint for which Plaintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to the Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 10/6/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek) Modified text on 10/6/2022 (mek).
October 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Deadline: Filing Fee due by 10/20/2022. (mek)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Pro Se Debtors NOTICE of Right to have exemptions designated by Alton Sharan Sapp (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Pro Se Amended MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis (Short Form) by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ef)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Mail (ORDER (document 4)) addressed to Alton Sharan Sapp 7801 Waterford Lakes Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 returned as undeliverable. (ef)
September 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Mail (Clerk's Notice of Case Assignment, Case Assignment Packet and Judge Bell's Standing Order) addressed to Alton Sharan Sapp 7801 Waterford Lakes Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 returned as undeliverable No Mail Receptacle. (ef)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall file an Application (Long Form, AO Form 239), within fourteen (14) days of entry of this Order or pay the filing fee. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 8/24/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Set Deadline: Amended IFP Application or Filing Fee due by due by 9/7/2022. (mek)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The order was served conventionally. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (tlj)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally by US Mail (tlj)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Default Judgment as to by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope) (tlj)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tlj)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Attachment, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(tlj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sapp v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Charlotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MJ Putnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnny Jennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?