Roeder v. Merck and Co., Inc.et al
Plaintiff: Megan Marie Roeder
Defendant: Merck and Co. and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Case Number: 3:2022cv00431
Filed: August 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
2 Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Magistrate Judge David Keesler no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER of Administrative Close Out of Member Cases. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/12/2022. (brl)
September 6, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Wiest Bryan on behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck and Co. (Bryan, Sally)
September 6, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Dino S. Sangiamo on behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck and Co. (Sangiamo, Dino)
August 30, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 10/11/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom #8, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FIRST PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/9/22. (rth)
August 22, 2022 Filing 10 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:22-cv-04284. Original electronic file and docket sheet received.
August 22, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(rth)
August 22, 2022 Filing 9 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER - ( CTO-1 ) from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3036, transferring case to USDC, Western District of North Carolina and assigned to Honorable Robert J. Conrad Jr. Case transferred electronically on 8/22/2022. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) Modified on 8/22/2022 (lc). [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 7 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Megan Marie Roeder, identifying Plaintiff Megan Marie Roeder; Paul Adrian Green, Esq. / Law Office of Paul Green (Counsel of Record); Bijan Esfandiari, Esq. / Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman (Prospective future Plaintiff's Counsel). (Green, Paul) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 22, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Megan Marie Roeder. (Green, Paul) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]
June 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-33510697 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Megan Marie Roeder. (Attorney Paul Adrian Green added to party Megan Marie Roeder(pty:pla))(Green, Paul) [Transferred from California Central on 8/23/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roeder v. Merck and Co., Inc.et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Marie Roeder
Represented By: Paul Adrian Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck and Co.
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?