Rolf v. Merck & Company Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Cheryl Rolf
Defendant: Merck & Company Incorporated and Merck Sharp & Dohme
Case Number: 3:2022cv00434
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Charlotte Office
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Robert J Conrad
2 Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2022 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Magistrate Judge David Keesler no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER of Administrative Close Out of Member Cases. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/12/2022. (brl)
September 6, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Wiest Bryan on behalf of Merck & Company Incorporated, Merck Sharp & Dohme (Bryan, Sally)
September 6, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Dino S. Sangiamo on behalf of Merck & Company Incorporated, Merck Sharp & Dohme (Sangiamo, Dino)
August 30, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 10/11/2022 11:00 AM in Courtroom #8, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before District Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brl)
August 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FIRST PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 8/9/22. (rth)
August 23, 2022 Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:22-cv-01188. Original electronic file and docket sheet received.
August 23, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFIED MDL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-3) Transferring Case to the Western District of North Carolina Re MDL-3036. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
August 23, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(rth)
August 23, 2022 Remark: Case Transferred to the Western District of North Carolina via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/18/2022. (JAMA) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on October 14, 2022. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 7/18/2022. (JAMA) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 15, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Merck & Company Incorporated, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 15, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-20880617. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01188-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 15, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Cheryl Rolf. (Downing, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]
July 15, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-20880617 filed by Cheryl Rolf. (Downing, Andrew) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) [Transferred from Arizona on 8/23/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rolf v. Merck & Company Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Rolf
Represented By: Andrew Downing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Company Incorporated
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?