Sapp v. District Attorney Charlotte, NC et al
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant: District Attorney Charlotte, NC, County of Mecklenburg and State of NC
Case Number: 3:2022cv00533
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Robert J Conrad
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 11/1/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the Court's October 11, 2022 Order. The Plaintiff's pending #3 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of this Court is directed to close this case. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 11/1/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
October 20, 2022 Filing 5 Pro Se Miscellaneous Filing: Proposed Execution by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Plaintiff shall PAY the filing fee in these actions within 14 days of this Order. Any Complaint for which Plaintiff fails to timely pay the filing fee will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to the Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 10/7/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek)
October 11, 2022 Set Deadline: Filing Fee due by 10/25/2022. (mek)
October 3, 2022 Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Default Judgment by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (ef)
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alton Sharan Sapp. (ef)
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against County of Mecklenburg, District Attorney Charlotte, NC, State of NC, filed by Alton Sharan Sapp. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Waiver of Service, #4 Summons, #5 Envelope)(ef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sapp v. District Attorney Charlotte, NC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alton Sharan Sapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District Attorney Charlotte, NC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Mecklenburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of NC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?