Dingle v. FedEx Corporation
Plaintiff: Christopher Dingle
Defendant: FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express and Federal Express Corporation doing business as FedEx Express
Case Number: 3:2022cv00600
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Max O Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to frederick.douglas@fedex.com> on 12/12/22 by Christopher Dingle. (Westmoreland, Anna)
December 12, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against FedEx Express, Federal Express Corporation, filed by Christopher Dingle.(Westmoreland, Anna)
November 15, 2022 Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Adams, Randall). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. FedEx Corporation's answer due 1/27/2023; FedEx Express's answer due 1/27/2023. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/15/2022. (DLG)
November 4, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to FedEx Corporation, FedEx Express. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons)(cjs)
November 2, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs)
November 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5814339), filed by Christopher Dingle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC CHARGE OF DISCRIMINATION, #2 Exhibit EEOC RIGHT TO SUE LETTER)(Westmoreland, Anna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dingle v. FedEx Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Dingle
Represented By: Anna N. Westmoreland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Corporation
Represented By: Randall R. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FedEx Express
Represented By: Randall R. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Express Corporation doing business as FedEx Express
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?