Pachon Gonzalez et al v. Blinken
| Luz D Pachon Gonzalez, Jorge A Perez Arias, Juan A Perez Pachon and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools |
| Antony J. Blinken |
| 3:2022cv00605 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Antony J. Blinken, US Attorney and US Attorney General. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Antony J. Blinken ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5816741), filed by Luz D Pachon Gonzalez, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Juan A Perez Pachon, Jorge A Perez Arias.(Harling, David) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
