United States of America v. Approximately $44,875 in United States Currency
United States of America |
Approximately $44,875 in United States Currency |
Dymond Thomas |
3:2022cv00637 |
November 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Graham Mullen |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Pro Se Verified CLAIM by Dymond Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(tlj) |
Filing 6 Pro Se ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Dymond Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(tlj) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/4/2023) (tlj). |
Filing 5 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 12/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, J.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Service (Direct Notice) by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, J.) |
Filing 3 Department of the Treasury Process Receipt and Return re #2 Warrant Issued for Arrest of Property, filed by United States of America. (Johnson, J.) |
Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest of Property. Signed by Clerk Frank G. Johns on 11/23/2022. (tlj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Approximately $44,875 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America.(Johnson, J.) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.