Jordan v. Hope Haven, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jacqueline L. Jordan
Defendant: Hope Haven, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv00640
Filed: November 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Max O Cogburn
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2023 NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 2/16/2023. (ams)
January 25, 2023 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hope Haven, Inc.. (Yarbrough, Jonathan)
January 25, 2023 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hope Haven, Inc..(Yarbrough, Jonathan)
December 25, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Hope Haven, Inc.'s answer due 1/26/2023. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/25/2022. (DLG)
December 24, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Hope Haven, Inc.. (Yarbrough, Jonathan). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
December 8, 2022 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Jacqueline L. Jordan. Hope Haven, Inc. served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Signed Return Receipt)(Stanton, Corey)
November 28, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Hope Haven, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (cjs)
November 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hope Haven, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5842448), filed by Jacqueline Jordan.(Stanton, Corey) Modified text on 11/28/2022 (kab).
November 28, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Hope Haven, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline L. Jordan
Represented By: Ethan Lev Willner Slabosky
Represented By: Corey Michael Stanton
Represented By: Philip J. Gibbons, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hope Haven, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan W. Yarbrough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?