Pagan v. Brogdon et al
| Lance Richardson Pagan |
| David Brogdon, Derick Meek, Ron Brown and Shannon LNU |
| 3:2022cv00693 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Charlotte Office |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Pro Se Letter from Lance Pagan *to Clerk of Court re: inquiry of status of this case. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjs) Modified *text on 2/22/2023. NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
| Filing 7 Deleted Document. Filed in wrong case. (ejb) Modified on 2/23/2023. NEF Regenerated (ejb). |
| Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) as to Lance Richardson Pagan submitted by Catawba County Detention Facility. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 12/29/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smm)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(kab)
|
| Filing 3 Pro Se Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Lance Richardson Pagan (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kab) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Lance Richardson Pagan (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kab) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lance Richardson Pagan. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
