Patton v. Anderson et al
Tony Patton |
Riley Anderson, Justin Kirkland and Rick Green |
3:2023cv00087 |
February 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Justin Kirkland. Responses due by 4/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Memorandum in Support Of Motion to Dismiss) (Tisdale, H.). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Defendant Justin Kirkman's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Justin Kirkland answer due 4/14/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 3/15/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Florence Cheryl Nwaa Thompson on behalf of Justin Kirkland (Thompson, Florence) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Justin Kirkland. (Tisdale, H.). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Riley Anderson, Rick Green, Justin Kirkland. (cjs) Docket Text Modified on 2/16/2023 (cjs). |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 2121), filed by Tony Patton. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(cjs) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally at case filing (cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.