Smith v. Checkr, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kiana Smith
Defendant: Checkr, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv00140
Filed: March 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David S Cayer
Referring Judge: Max O Cogburn
2 Judge: Susan C Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2023 NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 5/12/2023. (ams)
April 19, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Checkr, Inc..(Goemann, Ethan)
April 4, 2023 Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(hms)
March 22, 2023 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Checkr, Inc.. (Goemann, Ethan)
March 22, 2023 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Checkr, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Goemann, Ethan). Motions referred to David S. Cayer.
March 22, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ethan Coretz Goemann on behalf of Checkr, Inc. (Goemann, Ethan)
March 22, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Checkr, Inc.'s answer due 4/19/2023. So Ordered. Entered by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 3/22/2023. (DLG)
March 6, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Checkr, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (cjs)
March 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-5967071), filed by Kiana Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Blossom, Rashad)
March 6, 2023 Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Checkr, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kiana Smith
Represented By: Rashad Blossom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Checkr, Inc.
Represented By: Ethan Coretz Goemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?