United States of America v. Glock 19 Gen5 Pistol et al
United States of America |
One Glock, Model 19GEN5 Pistol, serial number AGVX786, and One Romarm/Cugir, Model Micro Draco Pistol, serial number ROA 22 PMD-31391, Glock 19 Gen5 Pistol and Romarm/Cugir Micro Draco Pistol |
3:2023cv00165 |
March 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
David Keesler |
Frank D Whitney |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 04/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, J.) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Service (Direct Notice) by United States of America re #1 Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, J.) |
Filing 3 USDOJ Process Receipt and Return re #2 Warrant Issued for Arrest of Property, filed by United States of America. (Johnson, J.) |
Filing 2 WARRANT Issued for Arrest of Property. Signed by Clerk Frank G. Johns on 3/20/2023. (tlj) |
Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(tlj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Forfeiture In Rem against Glock 19 Gen5 Pistol, and Romarm/Cugir Micro Draco Pistol filed by United States of America.(Johnson, J.) Modified docket text on 3/20/2023 (tlj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.