Amar v. Bank of America, N.A.
Nesia Amar |
Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. |
3:2023cv00221 |
April 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A.. (Urps, Tonya) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Joint Motion to Substitute Party. Bank of America, N.A. added. Bank of America Corporation terminated. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/11/23. (mga) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Bank of America Corporation answer due 6/12/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/10/23. (mga) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Nesia Amar. (Perry, M.). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 9 Joint MOTION to Substitute Party Bank of America, N.A. by Nesia Amar. Responses due by 5/24/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion) (Perry, M.). Motions referred to David Keesler. Modified Docket Text on 5/10/2023 (cjs). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Tonya L. Urps on behalf of Bank of America Corporation (Urps, Tonya) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by T. Richmond McPherson, III on behalf of Bank of America Corporation (McPherson, T.) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added John A. Love for Nesia Amar (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 4/19/23. (mga) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Seth Lehrman for Nesia Amar (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 4/19/23. (mga) |
Notice to Seth Lehrman: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 4/27/2023. (mga) |
Notice to John A. Love: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 4/27/2023. (mga) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to Bank of America Corporation. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (mdp) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. Motions referred to David Keesler: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to John A. Love Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6029572., #2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Seth Lehrman Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6029529. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(mdp) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to John A. Love Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6029572. by Nesia Amar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Bar Admissisons) (Perry, M.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Seth Lehrman Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6029529. by Nesia Amar. (Perry, M.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bank of America Corporation with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6029477), filed by Nesia Amar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Account Review Inquiries, #2 Exhibit Positive Account Activity)(Perry, M.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.