Miller v. Tata Consultancy Services et al
| Daishawn Lavon Miller |
| Tata Consultancy Services, Kelly Murphy, Rachel Brokaw and Stephanie Blackwell |
| 3:2023cv00231 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: IFP Application or filing fee by 6/7/2023. (mga) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Revised and fully completed Application or filing fee due 6/7/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/19/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daishawn Lavon Miller. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cjs). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of 402.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 5/16/2023. (ef) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Stephanie Blackwell, Rachel Brokaw, Kelly Murphy, Tata Consultancy Services with Jury Demand, filed by Daishawn Lavon Miller. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Envelope)(ef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
