Foster v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
| Joy Foster |
| Publix Super Markets, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00300 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Susan C Rodriguez |
| Frank D Whitney |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan . ALL Parties Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction (Dressler, Brett) |
| NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 5 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 7/5/2023. (clc) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Publix Super Markets, Inc..(Poole, Samuel) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Publix Super Markets, Inc. answer due 6/14/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 5/22/2023. (brl)
|
| Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by Publix Super Markets, Inc.. (Poole, Samuel). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Publix Super Markets, Inc.. (Poole, Samuel) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (mdp) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(mdp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 23 CVS 6996. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6075239), filed by Publix Super Markets, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-State Notice of Removal)(Poole, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joy Foster | |
| Represented By: | Brett E. Dressler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Publix Super Markets, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Hawley Poole, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
