Flores v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
| Soriely Flores |
| Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC |
| 3:2023cv00302 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER of Administrative Close Out of Member Cases. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/12/2022.(rth)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Wiest Bryan on behalf of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (Bryan, Sally) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Dino S. Sangiamo on behalf of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (Sangiamo, Dino) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (cjs) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6077011), filed by Soriely Flores. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons to Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC)(Esfandiari, Bijan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
