Lexington Insurance Company v. Trane Technologies, PLC et al
Lexington Insurance Company |
Trane Technologies, PLC and Swep North America, Inc. |
3:2023cv00326 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
Susan C Rodriguez |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Swep North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Extension of Time) (Lam, Christopher). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher C. Lam on behalf of Swep North America, Inc. (Lam, Christopher) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Samuel Martin Dearstyne on behalf of Swep North America, Inc. (Dearstyne, Samuel) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Lexington Insurance Company. Trane Technologies, PLC served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. (Conner, Brittany) Modified answer date on 7/31/2023 (brl). |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Lexington Insurance Company. Swep North America, Inc. served on 7/10/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. (Conner, Brittany) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 and #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice added Andrew E. Barrett and Geoffrey D. Farnham for Lexington Insurance Company (Pro Hac Vice Attorney served via NEF). Signed by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 7/27/2023. (brl) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Geoffrey Farnham Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6159634. by Lexington Insurance Company. (Conner, Brittany). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Andrew Barrett Filing fee $ 288, receipt number ANCWDC-6159627. by Lexington Insurance Company. (Conner, Brittany). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
Notice to Andrew E. Barrett: Pursuant to Local Rule 83.1 you are required to Register for E-Filing Access or Link Existing Account #Link. (Attorney served via NEF) Deadline by 8/3/2023. (brl) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Trane Technologies, PLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Berkelhammer, Jon). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Scottie Forbes Lee on behalf of Trane Technologies, PLC (Lee, Scottie) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jon A. Berkelhammer on behalf of Trane Technologies, PLC (Berkelhammer, Jon) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Trane Technologies, PLC's answer due 8/30/2023. So Ordered. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 7/18/2023. (DLG) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lexington Insurance Company. (Conner, Brittany) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Swep North America, Inc., Trane Technologies, PLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (tlj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6093853), filed by Lexington Insurance Company,(Conner, Brittany) Modified docket text on 6/2/2023 (mdp). |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(mdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.