Lewis v. Miller Valentine Group et al
| Leegraciea Lewis |
| Miller Valentine Group, Steele Creek Apartments Limited Partnership, Southwood Realty Company Property Manager and Landings at Steele Creek Apartments |
| 3:2023cv00361 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ROSEBORO ORDER Setting Response Deadline re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction of Subject Matter. Responses due by 8/28/2023. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/14/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction of Subject Matter by Southwood Realty Company Property Manager. Responses due by 8/23/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction) (Becker, Allison) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Landings at Steele Creek Apartments answer due 8/21/2023; Miller Valentine Group answer due 8/21/2023; Steele Creek Apartments Limited Partnership answer due 8/21/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/21/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Landings at Steele Creek Apartments, Miller Valentine Group, Steele Creek Apartments Limited Partnership. (Pinto, Andrew). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Garrison Pinto on behalf of Miller Valentine Group (Pinto, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Garrison Pinto on behalf of Landings at Steele Creek Apartments (Pinto, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Garrison Pinto on behalf of Steele Creek Apartments Limited Partnership (Pinto, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Southwood Realty Company Property Manager. (Williams, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Southwood Realty Company Property Manager answer due 8/9/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 7/18/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Southwood Realty Company Property Manager. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Answer Complaint) (Williams, Benjamin). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Luke Williams on behalf of Southwood Realty Company Property Manager (Williams, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Allison J. Becker on behalf of Southwood Realty Company Property Manager (Becker, Allison) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Landings at Steele Creek Apartments, Miller Valentine Group, Steele Creek Apartments Limited Partnership. (tlj) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 4200), filed by Leegraciea Lewis.(tlj) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. And #Initial Scheduling Order and Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The document was served conventionally at case filing (tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
