Gonzalez v. City of Charlotte et al
| Martin Marin Gonzalez |
| City of Charlotte, John Doe, I, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, Joshua Michael Eyer and John and Jane Does |
| 3:2023cv00403 |
| July 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Joshua Michael Eyer. Joshua Michael Eyer waiver sent on 8/7/2023, answer due 10/6/2023. (McCalman, Roger) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by City of Charlotte. City of Charlotte waiver sent on 7/25/2023, answer due 9/25/2023. (McCalman, Roger) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Roger A. McCalman on behalf of City of Charlotte (McCalman, Roger) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Eyer on 07/06/2023 by Martin Marin Gonzalez. (Thompson, Brian) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to City of Charlotte on 07/06/2023 by Martin Marin Gonzalez. (Thompson, Brian) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(mdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6133494), filed by Martin Marin Gonzalez.(Thompson, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
