Cann v. Bank of America Corporation
D'voreaux Cann |
Bank of America Corporation |
3:2023cv00408 |
July 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Robert J Conrad |
David Keesler |
Truth in Lending |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Bank of America Corporation answer due 9/25/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/25/23. (mga) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America Corporation. (Urps, Tonya) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Tonya L. Urps on behalf of Bank of America Corporation (Urps, Tonya) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Bank of America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Urps, Tonya). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Bank of America Corporation served on 8/4/2023, answer due 8/25/2023. (jm) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically to US Marshal for service as to Bank of America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 USM285)(brl) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 1] survives initial review under Section 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff's #4 Motion/Request for the Court to Serve Summons on Behalf of Plaintiff is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is instructed to direct the U.S. Marshal to effectuate serviceupon Defendant Bank of America Corporation using the Summons Plaintiff filedat Docket No. 1-2. Signed by Senior District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 7/25/2023. (brl) |
Filing 4 Pro Se Request for the Court to Serve Summons on Behalf of Plaintiff by D'voreaux Cann. Responses due by 7/20/2023 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cjs). Modified to remove referral on 7/7/2023 (mga). |
Filing 3 Pro Se Request to Receive Electronic Notification by D'voreaux Cann. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjs) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by D'voreaux Cann. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cjs) |
Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Bank of America Corporation with Jury Demand, filed by D'voreaux Cann. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope)(cjs) |
Case reassigned to Senior District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. District Judge Frank D. Whitney, US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(clc) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally by US Mail (cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cann v. Bank of America Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: D'voreaux Cann | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation | |
Represented By: | Tonya L. Urps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.