Sullivan v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: A.S., by and through his Guardian ad Litem, REBECCA SULLIVAN and Rebecca Sullivan
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv00463
Filed: July 25, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Robert J Conrad
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER of Administrative Close Out of Member Cases. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 9/12/2022. (rth)
July 26, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sally Wiest Bryan on behalf of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (Bryan, Sally)
July 26, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Dino S. Sangiamo on behalf of Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (Sangiamo, Dino)
July 26, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (jm)
July 25, 2023 Case assigned to Senior District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(jm)
July 25, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6157289), filed by Rebecca Sullivan as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.S.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC)(Esfandiari, Bijan) Modified text on 7/26/2023 (brl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A.S., by and through his Guardian ad Litem, REBECCA SULLIVAN
Represented By: Bijan Esfandiari
Represented By: Monique Amanda Alarcon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Sullivan
Represented By: Bijan Esfandiari
Represented By: Monique Amanda Alarcon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc.
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Represented By: Dino S. Sangiamo
Represented By: Sally Wiest Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?