Smith v. Teknos US, Inc.
Tedd Smith |
Teknos US, Inc. |
3:2023cv00592 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
Susan C Rodriguez |
Frank D Whitney |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint (Second) by Teknos US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Second Extension of Time to Answer) (Anstett, Zachary). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #8 Consent MOTION for Second Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. The parties report a tentative settlement and are finalizing settlement documents. Teknos US, Inc.'s answer due 12/6/2023. So Ordered. Entered by US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez on 11/1/2023. (DLG) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell. District Judge Frank D. Whitney no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(clc) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Teknos US, Inc.. (Anstett, Zachary) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Teknos US, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint) (Anstett, Zachary). Motions referred to Susan C. Rodriguez. |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Scott Anstett on behalf of Teknos US, Inc. (Anstett, Zachary) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Tedd Smith. Teknos US, Inc. served on 9/29/2023, answer due 10/20/2023. (Martoccio, Gary) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Teknos US, Inc.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (jm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Teknos US, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6226583), filed by Tedd Smith. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet)(Martoccio, Gary) |
Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(jm) |
Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Teknos US, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tedd Smith | |
Represented By: | Gary James Martoccio |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Teknos US, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Zachary Scott Anstett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.