Mesick et al v. North Carolina State Board of Education et al
| Craig Mesick and Joyce Mesick |
| North Carolina State Board of Education, Catherine Truitt, Union County Board of Education, Andrew Houlihan, Laura Beachum, Sarah Staley, Donald Van Ver Vaart, NC OAH and Hillary Koboth |
| 3:2023cv00647 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER denying as moot Defendant's #21 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/1/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 25 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Hillary Koboth. Hillary Koboth waiver sent on 11/14/2023, answer due 1/16/2024. (Lopez, Cynthia) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER granting #23 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #14 Amended Complaint . Laura Beachum answer due 12/18/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/21/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(brl)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #14 Amended Complaint by Laura Beachum. (Lopez, Cynthia). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Support re #21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint Filed on October 10, 2023 by Laura Beachum. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lopez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Complaint Filed on October 10, 2023 by Laura Beachum. Responses due by 11/29/2023 (Lopez, Cynthia). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Branch Jenkins on behalf of North Carolina State Board of Education, Catherine Truitt (Jenkins, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary A. Padget on behalf of North Carolina State Board of Education, Catherine Truitt (Padget, Zachary) |
| Filing 18 Pro Se Objection to Counsel for Independent Defendants by Craig Mesick, Joyce Mesick. (tlj) |
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Joyce Mesick, Craig Mesick. North Carolina State Board of Education waiver sent on 10/31/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (tlj) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Joyce Mesick, Craig Mesick. Catherine Truitt waiver sent on 10/31/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (tlj) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Hillary Koboth. (tlj) |
| Filing 14 Pro Se AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Joyce Mesick.(tlj) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting Defendants' #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. NC OAH answer due 12/13/2023; Donald Van Ver Vaart answer due 12/13/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/13/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint,,, by NC OAH, Donald Van Ver Vaart. (Spangler, Benjamin). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Thomas Spangler on behalf of NC OAH, Donald Van Ver Vaart (Spangler, Benjamin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna Gillespie on behalf of Andrew Houlihan, Sarah Staley, Union County Board of Education (Gillespie, Anna) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sarah Staley. Sarah Staley waiver sent on 10/19/2023, answer due 12/18/2023. (Lopez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Union County Board of Education. Union County Board of Education waiver sent on 10/19/2023, answer due 12/18/2023. (Lopez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Andrew Houlihan. Andrew Houlihan waiver sent on 10/19/2023, answer due 12/18/2023. (Lopez, Cynthia) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting Defendant Laura Beachum's #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint. Laura Beachum answer due 11/15/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 10/20/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint,,, by Laura Beachum. (Lopez, Cynthia). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Anna Gillespie on behalf of Laura Beachum (Gillespie, Anna) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia S. Lopez on behalf of Laura Beachum (Lopez, Cynthia) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Laura Beachum, Andrew Houlihan, North Carolina State Board of Education, Sarah Staley, NC OAH, Catherine Truitt, Union County Board of Education, Donald Van Ver Vaart. (jm) Modified text adding party on 10/23/2023 (mdp). |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Laura Beachum, Andrew Houlihan, North Carolina State Board of Education, Sarah Staley, Catherine Truitt, Union County Board of Education, Donald Van Ver Vaart with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 6086), filed by Joyce Mesick, Craig Mesick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 5a, #7 Exhibit 5b, #8 Exhibit 5c, #9 Exhibit 5d, #10 Exhibit 6, #11 Exhibit 7, #12 Exhibit 8, #13 Exhibit 9, #14 Exhibit 10, #15 Exhibit 11, #16 Exhibit 12, #17 Exhibit 13, #18 Exhibit 14, #19 Exhibit 15, #20 Exhibit 16, #21 Exhibit 17, #22 Exhibit 18, #23 Exhibit 19, #24 Exhibit 20)(jm) Modified on 10/10/2023 (jm). |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally at case filing (jm) |
| Case assigned to Senior Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
