Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
| Compass Group USA, Inc. |
| Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill, Inc., Cargill Protein, Cargill Protein North America, JBS S.A., JBS USA Food Company, Swift Beef Company, JBS Packerland, Inc., National Beef Packing Company, Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00725 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| David Keesler |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Transfer Order of Judicial Panel MDL transferring case to District of Minnesota, MDL# 3031. Matter transferred for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Signed by Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel, on 11/14/23. (rth) |
| Case transferred to District of Minnesota has been opened as case 0:23-cv-03550 (rth) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(jm) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Compass Group USA, Inc.. (Wheeler, Travis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6276380), filed by Compass Group USA, Inc..(Wheeler, Travis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
