McKeown v. Microsoft Corporation
| Michael McKeown |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 3:2023cv00743 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Microsoft Corporation (All Claims Dismissed. Case to be Closed). (Fryer, Benjamin) |
Filing 7
ORDER that the #6 Notice of Settlement and Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer is GRANTED. The parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal, or Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, on or before 12/27/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/4/2023. (brl)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Microsoft Corporation. (Fryer, Benjamin). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting with modification Defendant's #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint contained in the Notice of Removal. Microsoft Corporation answer due 12/5/2023. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/9/23. (mga)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Microsoft Corporation. (Fryer, Benjamin). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Microsoft Corporation. (Fryer, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Paul Fryer on behalf of Microsoft Corporation (Fryer, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Union County Superior Court, case number 23-CVS-2691. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANCWDC-6287955), filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Erin Flaucher, #4 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Fryer, Benjamin) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Frank D. Whitney and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Initial Scheduling Order and #Certificate of Initial Attorney FRCP 26(f) Conference Form pursuant to the Standing Order Governing Civil Case Management before the Honorable Frank D. Whitney (3:07-mc-47 (Doc. No. 2)). The parties are directed to click on the link above to retrieve the Order. (cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McKeown v. Microsoft Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael McKeown | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Andres Cordero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microsoft Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Paul Fryer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
