Smith v. Mecklenburg County Human Resources et al
| Sheena Smith |
| Mecklenburg County Human Resources and Mecklenburg County Child Support Enforcement |
| 3:2023cv00779 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| David Keesler |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.The Complaint [Doc. 1] is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of this Order, file a superseding Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 12/12/23. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 1/12/2024. (clc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheena Smith. (cjs) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Mecklenburg County Child Support Enforcement, Mecklenburg County Human Resources with Jury Demand, filed by Sheena Smith. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(cjs) |
| Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant was served conventionally at case filing.)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
