Gaddy v. City of Charlotte Solid Waste Services et al
Plaintiff: Shaequontia Gaddy
Defendant: City of Charlotte Solid Waste Services, Frank Houser and Kourtney Briggs
Case Number: 3:2023cv00855
Filed: December 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Referring Judge: Frank D Whitney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days of this Order. Should the Plaintiff fail to do so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/30/24. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
January 31, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing Fee due by 3/1/2024. (clc)
January 26, 2024 Filing 4 AMENDED MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaequontia Gaddy. (mdp)
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or refile an Application within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 1/8/24. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(clc)
January 9, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended IFP Application due by 1/30/2024 or Filing Fee due by 1/30/2024. (clc)
December 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaequontia Gaddy. (cjs)
December 14, 2023 Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Kourtney Briggs, City of Charlotte Solid Waste Services, Frank Houser with Jury Demand, filed by Shaequontia Gaddy. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(cjs)
December 14, 2023 Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant served conventionally at case filing.)(cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaddy v. City of Charlotte Solid Waste Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaequontia Gaddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Charlotte Solid Waste Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Houser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kourtney Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?