Hughes v. MMR Contractors et al
| Terry Hughes |
| MMR Contractors and Cianbro Corp |
| 3:2023cv00865 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Robert J Conrad |
| David Keesler |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail ( #3 ORDER and Amended IFP Aplplication) addressed to Terry Hughes 235 North Point Ave Highpoint, NC 27262 returned as undeliverable. (tlj) |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall either file an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within 21 days of this order. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice and this case will be closed without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 01/08/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mdp)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Filing Fee or Amended IFP Application due by 1/29/2024. (mdp) |
| Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Hughes. (cjs) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Cianbro Corp, MMR Contractors, filed by Terry Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(cjs) |
| Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order (Pro se litigant served Conventionally at Case Filing.)(cjs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
