Glenn v. Velociti, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Scott Glenn
Defendant: Velociti, Inc. and Deryk L. Powell
Case Number: 3:2024cv00031
Filed: January 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: Robert J Conrad
Referring Judge: David Keesler
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan: Estimated Trial Time: 2 days. Discovery due by 8/30/2024. Motions due by 9/27/2024. Mediation deadline set for 11/29/2024. Jury Trial set for 1/6/2025 09:30 AM in Courtroom #4A, 401 W Trade St, Charlotte, NC 28202 before Senior Judge Robert J. Conrad Jr. Signed by Senior Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 02/21/2024. (mdp)
February 8, 2024 Filing 4 Joint CERTIFICATION of initial attorney conference and discovery plan (Thurman, Frederick)
January 22, 2024 NOTICE pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 you are required to conduct an Initial Attorney's Conference within 14 days. At the conference, the parties are required to discuss the issue of consent to jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with Local Rules 16.1(A) and 73.1(C). The #Certificate of Initial Attorneys Conference, and if applicable, the #Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise jurisdiction by a US Magistrate Judge, should be filed within 7 days of the conference. If appropriate, a party may file a Motion to Stay the Initial Attorney's Conference. CIAC Report due by 2/12/2024. (mdp)
January 18, 2024 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Deryk L. Powell, Velociti, Inc..(Honeycutt, James)
January 11, 2024 Case assigned to Senior Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(cjs)
January 11, 2024 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Velociti, Inc.. (Honeycutt, James)
January 11, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg County Superior Court, case number 23CV038708-590. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6362906), filed by Deryk L. Powell, Velociti, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Pleadings, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court Notice of Removal Filing)(Honeycutt, James)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glenn v. Velociti, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Scott Glenn
Represented By: Frederick M. Thurman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Velociti, Inc.
Represented By: James Michael Honeycutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deryk L. Powell
Represented By: James Michael Honeycutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?