Clearfield, Inc. v. NSI Industries, Inc. et al
Clearfield, Inc. |
NSI Industries, Inc. and NSI-LYNN Electronics, LLC |
3:2024cv00282 |
March 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Max O Cogburn |
Susan C Rodriguez |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (llp) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the Filing of an action regarding patent and/or trademark numbers contained in complaint. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (llp) |
Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and US Magistrate Judge Susan C. Rodriguez. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(llp) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Clearfield, Inc.. (Evans, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6431013), filed by Clearfield, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - US 9,297,976, #2 Exhibit 2 - '976 Claim Chart, #3 Exhibit 3 - Bullet Fiber Webpage, #4 Exhibit 4 - Customer Help Webpage, #5 Exhibit 5 - Bullet Fiber Data Sheet, #6 Exhibit 6 - Bullet Fiber Instruction Manual, #7 Exhibit 7 - US 9,678,285, #8 Exhibit 8 - '285 Claim Chart, #9 Exhibit 9 - US 10,007,068, #10 Exhibit 10 - '068 Claim Chart)(Evans, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.