Vila v. Fashivly, Inc.
Carlos Vila |
Fashivly, Inc. |
3:2024cv00453 |
May 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Carlos Vila. (Yusuf, Larita) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fashivly, Inc. with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6508892), filed by Carlos Vila. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Photograph, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of Photograph)(Yusuf, Larita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vila v. Fashivly, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carlos Vila | |
Represented By: | Larita Yusuf |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fashivly, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.