Tsaudu et al v. Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Ashenafi Tsaudu and Frewoini Woldegerima Woldemichael |
| Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 3:2024cv00467 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Max O Cogburn |
| David Keesler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, US Attorney and US Attorney General. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-6515789), filed by Ashenafi Tsaudu, Frewoini Woldegerima Woldemichael. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons - Attorney General, #3 Exhibit Summons - USAO, #4 Exhibit Summons - USCIS)(Lopez, Andres) Modified docket text on 5/10/2024 (mdp). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr and US Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(mdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
