Brewington v. Getrag Corporation
Wesley Martin Brewington |
Getrag Corporation |
5:2009cv00031 |
March 25, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment Office |
Catawba |
David Keesler |
Richard Voorhees |
None |
Federal Question |
42:12101 Americans With Disability Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated October 12, 2011. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brewington v. Getrag Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Wesley Martin Brewington | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Getrag Corporation | |
Represented By: | Nicole Marie Thompson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.