Estes Express Lines, Inc. v. Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc. et al
Estes Express Lines, Inc. |
Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc., Doe Corporations 1-10 and John Does 1-10 |
5:2009cv00084 |
July 22, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Statesville Office |
Catawba |
David S. Cayer |
Richard Voorhees |
None |
49 U.S.C. ยง 11702 (a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 DEFAULT JUDGMENT granted in favor of Plaintiff against Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc. Because the well-pleaded allegations and breach-of-contract theory of recovery support the relief sought, default judgment is hereby en tered in favor of Plf in the amount of $187,735.54, plus interest from the date of the Second Amended Complaint, July 17, 2013, at the federal statutory rate until the judgment is satisfied, as well as plf's costs in this matter. The Court declines to award attorney's fees. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/22/2013. (cbb) |
Filing 21 ORDER ordering that plf be given leave to amend its Complaint and correct the several defects already noted by the Court. Plf shall submit within one week of the date on which this Order is filed both its Second Amended Complaint and its renewed Motion for Default Judgment. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the case's dismissal. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 7/10/2013. (cbb) |
Filing 19 ORDER denying 16 Motion for Default Judgment without prejudice. It is further ordered that plf submit within one week of the date on which this Order is filed its memorandum opposing dismissal of the Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 3/25/2013. (cbb) |
Filing 17 ORDER re 16 Unopposed MOTION for Default Judgment as to Carpenter Decorating Company, Inc. ordering that Plaintiff be provided 11 days from the filing date of this order to file a memorandum establishing this Court's jurisdictional basis. If such memorandum is not timely filed, the case shall be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiff's Memorandum due by 7/9/2011. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 6/28/12. (smj) |
Filing 14 ORDER notifying plf that dismissal is contemplated. Plf has two weeks from the date this order is filed to submit a Motion for Default Judgment or Status Report. Should plf fail to comply with this directive, this case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 6/14/2012. (cbb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.