Lackey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Randy D. Lackey
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2010cv00030
Filed: March 9, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Statesville Office
Presiding Judge: David S. Cayer
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: Diversity - Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss. All of Plaintiff's claims are therefore dismissed and the case is close. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 7/14/11. (smj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lackey v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Represented By: John E. Grupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy D. Lackey
Represented By: Angela Newell Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?