Cassell v. Dawkins et al
| Charles M. Cassell, III |
| FNU Dawkins, FNU Queen and Shift Sergeants on Red Unit Lock Up |
| 5:2010cv00191 |
| December 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Alexander |
| Robert J. Conrad |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 7/29/15. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(smj)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER directing plf to submit to the Court within 14 days from service of this Order a statement as to whether he exhausted his administrative remedies before filing this action. If plf fails to respond to this order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice to plf. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/30/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
|
Filing
11
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated December 30, 2010. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER dismissing 1 Complaint pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g), denying as moot 2 Memorandum in Support of Preliminary Injunction and TRO. Signed by Chief Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 12/28/2010. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
