Johnson v. North Carolina, State of et al
Plaintiff: Katheryn R. Johnson
Defendant: North Carolina, State of and Keith Whitener
Case Number: 5:2011cv00057
Filed: April 25, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Office: Statesville Office
County: Alexander
Presiding Judge: David Keesler
Presiding Judge: Richard Voorhees
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated October 16, 2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (cbb)
April 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER STAYING all pretrial deadlines pending further Order or direction from the Court concerning NC's Motion for Summary Judgment. Unless otherwise instructed by the Court, the parties are likewise excused from appearing for Calendar Call on May 6, 2013. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 4/17/2013. (cbb)
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER granting 43 Motion to Seal Document 44 Sealed Document. Exhibit 4A shall be sealed until further Order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/28/2013. (cbb)
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 15 Dft. State of NC's Motion For Partial Dismissal of Plaintiff's claims; granting 22 Dft. Whitener's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's claims. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 10/17/12. (smj)
June 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 26 Motion to Make Filings in Paper Form; granting 27 Motion to File Response to State of NC's Partial Motion to Dismiss; granting 28 Motion to File Reponse to Keith Whitener's Motion to Dismiss. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 15 MOTION to Dismiss Partial, 22 MOTION to Dismiss .(Responses due by 6/25/2012.), Motions terminated: 28 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss , 27 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: 15 MOTION to Dismiss Partial, 26 MOTION for Leave to File.Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 6/12/2012. (cbb)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/2/12. (smj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. North Carolina, State of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katheryn R. Johnson
Represented By: E. Bedford Cannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Carolina, State of
Represented By: Oliver Gray Wheeler, IV
Represented By: Terence D. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Whitener
Represented By: Terence D. Friedman
Represented By: Oliver Gray Wheeler, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?