Jolly v. McBarney et al
| Peter Jolly |
| David Thomas McBarney, Guntis Grabazs and Caitlin Elizabeth Joy |
| 5:2011cv00062 |
| May 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Watauga |
| David S. Cayer |
| Richard Voorhees |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 47 Consent Motion to Stay. It is further ordered that the parties submit quarterly status reports pending resolution of plf's declaratory judgment action in Tennessee's courts. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/21/2013. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/1/2013. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting 36 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Roberta B. King terminated; granting 36 Motion to Relieve dft McBurney's Liability Carrier of Obligation to Defend. See attached image of Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/19/2013. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER denying as moot 31 Plf's Motion To Shorten Time For Defendants To Provide Expert Witness Reports. All pretrial deadlines not previously extended are extended 6 months. Trial is scheduled for the first day of the September 2013 Trial Term. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/30/12. (smj)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Evan M. Meade for Peter Jolly. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 5/19/2011. (cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
