Winthrop Resources v. CommScope, Inc.
| Winthrop Resources Corporation, Inc. |
| CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina |
| CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina |
| Winthrop Resources Corporation, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv00172 |
| December 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Catawba |
| David S. Cayer |
| Richard Voorhees |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER granting Winthrop's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Commscope's 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Parties will address issue of amount and reasonableness of attys' fees as follows: Winthrop shall submit Mot/Attys' Fees within 14 days; Commscope may file response to the motion within 14 days; Winthrop may file a reply within 7 days. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 2/10/2015. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 44 Objection to Magistrate Judge's Decision (Rule 72(a)) re 42 Order on Motion to Compel, except as to the question in Kim Dep. 262:25-263:1-4; granting 46 Unopposed Motion to Stay; granting 56 M otion for Leave to File a Reply in that the Court considered the attached reply. The parties are directed to take the deposition in the Western District of NC or such other location in the United States as the parties may agree. Within 30 days from entry of this Order, defendant shall make Kap Kim available for deposition where he shall answer all questions he was instructed by counsel not to answer in accordance with this Order as well as reasonable follow up questions. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 11/7/2014. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Compel. Within 30 days from entry of this Order, dft shall make Kap Kim available for deposition where he shall answer the 21 questions he was instructed not to answer as well as reasonable follo w up questions. The deposition shall take place within the Western District of NC or such other location in the US as the parties may agree. The dispositive motions deadline is extended to 9/1/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 7/1/2014. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting 37 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Jennifer M. Huelskamp for CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/17/2014. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Manmeet Singh Walia for Winthrop Resources Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 11/8/13. (smj)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims III (Unjust Enrichment), IV (North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices), and V (Minnesota Deceptive Trade Practices. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 7/31/2013. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jeffrey J. Mayer; granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to John T. Shapiro; granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Megan M. Kokontis; added Jeffrey J. Mayer, John T. Shapiro, Megan M. Kokontis for CommScope, Inc. of North Carolina. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/29/2011. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; added Geoffrey L. Harrison, David H. Orozco for Winthrop Resources Corporation, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/2/2011. (cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
